Talk:Broad On

image showing how this character is written

This image was added to the article, then commented out as "incorrect original research", then restored with the comment still in the source. Can anyone comment on the validity of this information? —Coroboy (talk) 05:03, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

I dont think so. The serifs are added to tell the difference, but in serif font, they are dots. I think its an o, but then you write two lines to show the diffirence. Can anybody show me an image of that? 23.241.246.117 (talk) 21:53, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Already in page

This page is in Cyrillic O variants, so this article should be changed to a redirect to here. 23.241.246.117 (talk) 21:44, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Close this disscussion when above is true. 47.156.111.90 (talk) 14:26, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

It's called round omega sometimes

idk 92.97.136.205 (talk) 18:41, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

removed original text

The text "Round Omega is a misleading Unicode name" used to be in the page but got removed. Should something like this be in here now? 47.149.187.169 (talk) 22:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

In Wikipedia, texts are based on published sources. Do you have sources that call it misleading? --Altenmann >talk 17:24, 4 October 2024 (UTC)