Talk:Brodmann areas 35 and 36
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Klbrain in topic Proposed merge with Brodmann area 36
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Brodmann area 36 page were merged into Brodmann areas 35 and 36 on 11 January 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Proposed merge with Brodmann area 36
editBrodmann areas 35 and 36 make up the perirhinal cortex and would be better presented on one page, similar to Brodmann areas 41 and 42 that make up the auditory cortex Iztwoz (talk) 11:47, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support merge to Perirhinal complex per rationale above. What do you think Iztwoz? --Tom (LT) (talk) 05:29, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
- Tom (LT) the proposal was for one entry Brodmann areas 35 and 36 in line with Brodmann areas 41 and 42 keeping the page perirhinal cortex - all other areas are listed as Brodmann areas save for the 3, 1, and 2 entered as the primary somatosensory cortex.--Iztwoz (talk) 16:17, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Iztwoz I see - so you feel for consistency with other Brodmann areas we should keep them as their own article? To clarify my meaning - I support a merge into a single page; I just wonder if perirhinal cortex might be the best target seeing as it is the area formed by Brodmann areas 35 + 36. --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:05, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
- Tom (LT) I think it was decided some time back to keep the Brodmann areas separate - they often contain info relevant to their particular location and presence or not in other animals. I'm just suggesting quite a minor change to place the two areas on the same page as 41 and 42 are.--Iztwoz (talk) 16:47, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
- Ok that is a good point. I support that too. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:57, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 06:11, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
- Ok that is a good point. I support that too. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:57, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
- Tom (LT) I think it was decided some time back to keep the Brodmann areas separate - they often contain info relevant to their particular location and presence or not in other animals. I'm just suggesting quite a minor change to place the two areas on the same page as 41 and 42 are.--Iztwoz (talk) 16:47, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Iztwoz I see - so you feel for consistency with other Brodmann areas we should keep them as their own article? To clarify my meaning - I support a merge into a single page; I just wonder if perirhinal cortex might be the best target seeing as it is the area formed by Brodmann areas 35 + 36. --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:05, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
- Tom (LT) the proposal was for one entry Brodmann areas 35 and 36 in line with Brodmann areas 41 and 42 keeping the page perirhinal cortex - all other areas are listed as Brodmann areas save for the 3, 1, and 2 entered as the primary somatosensory cortex.--Iztwoz (talk) 16:17, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
