Talk:Bromotrifluoromethane

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Citizenkrank in topic In popular culture

Mechanism of function

edit

How does it work?LorenzoB 05:35, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

See Gaseous fire suppression, "Inhibiting the chain reaction of the above components". Fireproeng 01:08, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
According to https://www.orrprotection.com/blog/bid/161598/halon-1301-top-6-most-asked-questions (section "Is Halon Safe?") it does not remove oxygen from the air, so it is probably only harmful if it touches the exterior part of a person* or enters someone via whatever route of administration. I think that dibromotetrafluoroethane displaces oxygen, though I'm not sure.
*Quote from https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/1_2-dibromotetrafluoroethane#section=Human-Toxicity-Excerpts and https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Bromotrifluoromethane#section=Human-Toxicity-Excerpts: "/SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS/ Excessive skin contact with liquid fluorocarbons should be minimized to prevent defatting of skin ... /Fluorocarbons/ -- International Labour Office. Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety. Vols. I&II. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office, 1983., p. 897". If dibromotetrafluoroethane and bromotrifluoromethane are fluorocarbons then they will defat the skin. --Bringback2ndpersonverbs (talk) 20:56, 27 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Danger

edit

In around 1990 I used to work in data centre that had a number of large mainframe computers and the whole computer room was protected by a halon-flooding system. The halon was stored in a number of green pressurised containers IIRC. We were told that the danger was not so much in the halon itself, but in the fact that the the gas was inert and so when used in a fire it filled the room replacing most of the air, leading to possible suffocation for anyone still inside. Hence the need to rapidly evacuate the room should the fire alarm sound, the halon system being triggered automatically. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.112.68.219 (talk) 15:11, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
I was told the Halon itself at the design - lower percentage is NO danger, no suffocation threat directly. However, the rapid evacuation is for setting A tight seal on space. A inrush of fresh air can lower percentage to level that a reflash can occur. Also if a fire is hot enough it might cause Halon to decompose, and decomposition results gases not certainly are not good for humans (some results are close if not the same as Chemical Warfare gases) 02:49, 19 January 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wfoj2 (talkcontribs)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bromotrifluoromethane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:46, 9 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bromotrifluoromethane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:05, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

decomposition products

edit

COBr2 is one of the decomposition products. that's right? decomposes on water. not very toxic.

but.... the other decomposition product then so is... a toxic fluoride. who wants a cyclone of toxic gases?

I see a problem here.

can halon be exchanged with COBr2 or CO2? is it that its a cold non burning liquid? Wikistallion (talk) 17:49, 22 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Replacements

edit

Dupont information sheet for the FE-36 replacement to halon: http://www.pyrochem.com/pdfs/flagfire/FE-36_Tech_Bu.pdf Rhodescus (talk) 18:19, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

Should a section on references to halon in popular culture be added? I've just noticed halon is idea in the movie resident evil (2002),but there must be other instances as well. Citizenkrank (talk) 20:13, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply