Talk:Brontë Waterfall
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name
editAs a landscape feature this waterfall undoubtedly would have had another earlier name before it received the ubiquitous 'Brontë' epithet. Anyone know what it was originally called? 86.134.92.106 (talk) 13:37, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
On the 1921 OS map the waterfalls are marked but not named, by the 1934 one they've gained the Bronte nae, as has the bridge and the "Bronte seat" just beside them. Ozwaldowl (talk) 19:48, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- In a 1906 map, the stream is listed as Lumb Beck, so they would presumably be Lumb Beck Falls? See the ref.[1] Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 20:17, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Explore georeferenced maps - Map images - National Library of Scotland". maps.nls.uk. Retrieved 10 February 2019.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Brontë Waterfall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041010015032/http://www.haworth-village.org.uk:80/brontes/places/bronte_falls.asp to http://www.haworth-village.org.uk/brontes/places/bronte_falls.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)