Talk:Brooklyn Public Library
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Long Construction Time
editCan any reason be given for the unusually long period for constuction of the Central Library? Construction began in 1912 and was completed in 1941
--Philopedia 22:22, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- It's explained in the last external link. --Nelson Ricardo 01:42, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- See "History" (PDF). BPL. Archived from the original (pdf) on June 8, 2006.
{{cite web}}
:|archive-date=
/|archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; March 6, 2006 suggested (help); Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help). WurmWoodeT 22:38, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- See "History" (PDF). BPL. Archived from the original (pdf) on June 8, 2006.
New Image is needed
editThe image of Central public library under construction does not correspond to the present day image. --Igoruha 15:35, January 4 2007 (UTC)
Relationship with Queens and NYPL
editNYPL and BPL accept each others members, but Queens does not. I've corrected the article.--Jeff (talk) 21:01, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- The BPL website says they do. Added it with citation.70.107.0.34 (talk) 21:38, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Crime or controversy section needed
editThis library has been the subject of wikiworthy crimes and/or controversies worthy of an encyclopedic article. For example, the library's Internet computers were used so much for porn that the library shut them down for a while. And just this week a rape occurred in the bathroom and the librarians were not even aware.
Now since I have commented on the latter (Retarded Teen Raped in Library Bathroom and Library is Unaware), and for other reasons, I should probably not write the section, but I can certainly suggest such a section should be considered.
When the 5th largest library shuts down its Internet due to excessive porn or when rapes occur and no librarian notices, that seems quite encyclopedic to me. What do others think about such a section? --LegitimateAndEvenCompelling (talk) 23:26, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Apparently, there was also a major controversy regarding the firing of some employees in or around August 2009. It supposedly caused the resignation of the BPL director. More here. --LegitimateAndEvenCompelling (talk) 06:14, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Brooklyn Public Library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110611223303/http://www.brooklynpubliclibrary.org/board_of_trustees.jsp to http://www.brooklynpubliclibrary.org/board_of_trustees.jsp
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://eagle.brooklynpubliclibrary.org/Default/Skins/BEagle/Client.asp?Skin=BEagle - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://eagle.brooklynpubliclibrary.org/Default/Skins/BEagle/Client.asp?Skin=BEagle - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://eagle.brooklynpubliclibrary.org/Default/Skins/BEagle/Client.asp?Skin=BEagle
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:29, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Brooklyn Public Library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110611223313/http://www.brooklynpubliclibrary.org/execdirbio.jsp to http://www.brooklynpubliclibrary.org/execdirbio.jsp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100307235248/http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6721715.html to http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6721715.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:34, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
New photo?
editI took this panorama of the main library recently. Posting it here to see if others think it belongs in the article. The current infobox photo is good quality -- the main thing I think this one has going for it (other than resolution, which doesn't really add that much in the infobox) is light/sky. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 17:54, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- I support it. Any opposition? Filetime (talk) 20:10, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Original headquarters
editIs this the original headquarters on Montague Street that was mentioned in the article, and if so, where on Montague Street was it? -------User:DanTD (talk) 20:19, 1 February 2023 (UTC)