Talk:Broomsticks in Harry Potter

Latest comment: 17 years ago by 76.197.9.181 in topic Why was the nimbus 2000 toy contreversial?

Sources

edit

I would just like to mention that the info of Staxringold's expansion on the broomsticks quote the exact words for most of the brooms featured in Qudditch Through The Ages. I'm not quite sure how to play around with HTML yet, and I'm not quite sure how to display the sources, but I'm sure the Quidditch Through The Ages is one. In any case, Stax got to the book first. Vinyourg 02:45, 10 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Other Broomsticks

edit

I expanded the information (and added, in some cases) for brooms other than the Nimbus series, Cleansweeps, Comets, and Firebolt. Staxringold 16:25, 27 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

I read in book four that there are brooms for little kids should we list these?user:ivel

Naughty broomstick

edit

http://www.mlcsmith.com/humor/nimbus_2000/

merge

edit

makes more sense here--Balloonguy 22:12, 1 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Why was the nimbus 2000 toy contreversial?

edit

72.24.191.233 01:46, 30 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

It was a vibrating toy that was designed to be placed between the legs. Some parents were dismayed when their children discovered that vibrating toys placed between the legs feel really, really good. (Sexual toys, for various reasons that are too complex to explain here, are quite controversial in many social groups within the United States.) 76.197.9.181 21:19, 21 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Nimbus2000.jpg

edit
 

Image:Nimbus2000.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:09, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Nimbus2000 2001.jpg

edit
 

Image:Nimbus2000 2001.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:09, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply