Talk:Brothers in Arms: Furious 4

Vandalism

I get it. People are angry. I'm angry too. But keep it to yourself, no need to vandalize this article. NATO.Caliber (talk) 11:56, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

I don't understand why people are so enraged about a brand name. Gearbox has said repeatedly that it's still going to make the fourth Baker game. So what if they want to make their brand bigger than just Baker and Co? There's no excuse for this childish nonsense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.164.241.251 (talk) 23:09, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

The Brothers in Arms name brand is only popular because it's known for one thing, authenticity, realism, hisorical accuracy, and fighting in real locations along real world historical people. Furious 4 does none of this, and has nothing in common with BIA. Its like the Call of Duty franchise, its known for arcade fast paced action, what if they decided to ALSO make a military simulator out of it, then a flight sim, then an RPG? you think the COD fas would be enraged over it? you bet,same for BIA fans. And for the record, most gamers opinions of Furious 4 have been subsantually negative,/uninterested, look at all the youtube comments of the trailer, or look how dead the official Gearbox Furious 4 forums are, just a lack of popularity with this game, Gearbox would be wise to keep BIA on its linear, well-respected path, a path thats been well earned over the years, it doesnt need to be tarnished by a cheapo kids arcade game, the BIA name is well known because it diverts away from run&gun arcade games, thats what makes BIA, BIA

Gearbox are a bunch of fucktards that have brought this series to hell. They're going to lose money on this fucking spinoff and I'd rather have another company run the series than these fucking idiots.

It is unfortunate that they decided to use the BIA name for this title, I and several people I know have no interest in the BIA series as none of us have liked the series so far. However several of us are seriously interested in this game as a possible excellent Co-Op game. I agree with the sentiment that they should just drop the BIA from the title and call it Furious Four, but don't think for a second there are not people hungry for good Co-Op games who will buy this (my store already has several pre-orders). Keep in mind Gearbox made Borderlands which is the most popular multi-platform Co-Op focused game this counsel generation. --71.63.136.134 (talk) 13:42, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Just because germans got their racist butt kicked at second world war does not give you any right to act violent towards video game makers or any kind of person in here . Name calling and silly comments like above is totally childish . usually nazi sympathizers do not like ww2 games or any kind of media with ww2 story line because nazis just can't take it. bad news for you , history will not disapper !just accept it and live with it.. millions of people have been waiting for this game .This game looks very original and fun and most importantly different. may be this is why me and all my friends will buy this game. just play ones and see how you like it. if you dot like this one go buy other boa games. and please give some respect to hard working people. take care — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.229.138.46 (talk) 04:48, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Game “indefinitely delayed” by Gearbox???

In the latest issue of GameInformer magazine, it is mentioned that Randy Pitchford of Gearbox has announced that the game has been “indefinitely delayed, citing an evolution to the development team’s approach.” If the article could be updated to reflect this new information, that would be great.216.157.195.66 (talk) 16:04, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Furious 4. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150404115302/http://www.gamesradar.com/brothers-arms-furious-4-missing-action-ubisoft-abandons-trademark/ to http://www.gamesradar.com/brothers-arms-furious-4-missing-action-ubisoft-abandons-trademark/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)