This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Not the original author of this article and have never read the book but agreed the page could do with a rewrite. Yes it was seriously unencyclopedic, but hopefully the rewrite turns it into a stub. The book seems to have received a good amount of attention, based on a simple Google search for the title, having been reviewed in a number of sites. I think it's a borderline keeper. Tt 225 11:14, 19 March 2007 (UTC)