Talk:Brugada syndrome/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Natureium (talk · contribs) 16:25, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

I've never done a GAN review before, so please let me know (politely) if I'm doing anything wrong.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   Suggested changes:

   Lead: new mutation -> new genetic mutation : Done PeaBrainC (talk) 20:59, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

   Causes: disturbed -> disrupted? : Done PeaBrainC (talk) 20:59, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

   Don't know if " known as loss of function mutations." fits in the paragraph : Done PeaBrainC (talk) 20:59, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

   Does the term "overlap syndrome" apply? The article on overlap syndrome only describes it in the context of autoimmune connective tissue disorders.: Not done Overlap syndrome is certainly a correct term to describe, for example, the phenotype of Brugada and Long QT 3 syndrome in the same patient, or Brugada and ARVC. I appreciate the current article for overlap syndrome doesn't explicitly mention this and I will try to add a paragraph to that article in due course PeaBrainC (talk) 20:59, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

   I have now amended the article on Overlap syndrome to better reflect that this term is used to refer to more than just autoimmune conditions. PeaBrainC (talk) 17:19, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

   in SCN5A that reduced -> reduces : Done PeaBrainC (talk) 20:59, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Mechanism: heart racing -> rapid heart rate : Done PeaBrainC (talk) 17:19, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

1. Diagnosis: link to ST elevation : Done PeaBrainC (talk) 17:19, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

   Choose either Genetic testing or Causes/genetics to mention incomplete penetrance : Done PeaBrainC (talk) 17:19, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

   "occurring as a bystander" is unnecessary and somewhat confusing : Done PeaBrainC (talk) 17:19, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

   Treatment: per WP:EL, external links do not belong in the body : Done PeaBrainC (talk) 17:19, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

   History: see in -> seen in : Done PeaBrainC (talk) 17:19, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

   lead to competing theories -> led to : Done PeaBrainC (talk) 17:19, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:

   Sources # 9, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 25, 28, 39, 41, 42, are primary sources, but are mainly used for background information

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Hi @Natureium:, thanks for reviewing this article. It's only my 2nd GAN but to my inexperienced eyes looks like you've done a good job. I will get on with making the amendments you have suggested and mark them as done on this page as I go. It may take a few days - busy times in the real world! PeaBrainC (talk) 09:48, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Looks good! Congrats! Natureium (talk) 21:50, 12 July 2018 (UTC)