Talk:Buckeye Manufacturing Company/GA1
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Shushugah in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Shushugah (talk · contribs) 09:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- Regarding MOS:LAYOUT, the WP:SEEALSO section currently contains many wikilinks that are already duplicated in the article. Only Lambert friction gearing disk drive transmission should remain.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- No formal issues. I personally would prefer if the Buckeye Manufacturing Company#Further readings used Template:Cite books to make it more structured, but it's not required. No copyright violations detected with Earwig tool.
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- No complaints here
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Relevant images, expired copyrights and captioned
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
This is an incredibly well written article, so most of my feedback are minor/easily fixed.
- Remove excessive WP:SEEALSO links
- Wikilink New York Central Railroad
- @Shushugah: All issues have been addressed. Can you take another look. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 10:13, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Doug Coldwell I removed some more links from WP:See also and now consider it a Good Article! I would recommend cleaning up the See also sections of all the related articles as well that you've created/nominated. The newspaper.com clips you've attached made it easy to do spot check reviews, nicely done. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 10:29, 6 June 2022 (UTC)