Talk:Buddhists in the United States military
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Requested move 2 April 2015
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved to Buddhists in the United States military - as RightCowLeftCoast points out, we should spell out "United States", and "military" should not be capitalised, this title isn't a proper noun. Otherwise, however, the move has broad support. (non-admin closure) — Amakuru (talk) 16:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Military history of Buddhist Americans → Buddhists in the US Military – The name was changed by the closing administrator, UtherSRG per the AfD. No consensus to change article back to original name. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 04:52, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support: sensible request, "Buddhist Americans" sounds very awkward and violates the "naturalness" requirement per WP:NC. Article is not just about the history of Buddhists in the US Military but also their current presence so current title is misleading. Also satisfies WP:CONCISE. Also recommend Military history of Sikh Americans → Sikhs in the US Military for the same reasons. Ebonelm (talk) 12:33, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support, the CRN is US army/navy/AF/military?...... GregKaye 14:18, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- support. the naming template "Military history of..." in wikipedia is traditionally for countries and places, not for ethnic groups. Also, the new title more correctly describes the scope: I can imagine Buddhist Americans fighting for the independence of Tibet :-) Staszek Lem (talk) 18:04, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Comment, should US be abbreviated? Should it be United States military?--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:49, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Buddhists in the United States military. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110825103905/http://www.af.mil/art/mediagallery.asp?galleryID=4929 to http://www.af.mil/art/mediagallery.asp?galleryID=4929
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)