Talk:Buffalo Bill Ranch

Untitled

The layout of the article mirrors the structure of high profile articles on Wikipedia which is excellent. In the middle of the article for example the section founding of Cody Ranch and Impact on Surrounding Areas the information is more geared to facts about Buffalo Bill Cody as opposed to the ranch itself. By linking Buffalo Bill Cody's extensive preexisting page on Wikipedia we have all the necessary facts about him and the information of this article should be focused on the history of the ranch instead of the history of Cody. It seemed to read more like a research essay one would right in a history class as opposed to a just the facts encyclopedia entry. There is colorful language such as Cody loved showcasing his new land. With this particular line it seems that the author is trying to sell me on how cool Cody is rather than telling me strictly the history of the ranch. Asyfie (talk) 04:30, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

This is a great article . However , in my opinion , I find certain parts a little draggy . For instance , the part where you talk about the acres were planted as corn, 100 acres of alfalfa and so on , maybe a simple summary of it would do. The impact of surrounding areas could be slotted into the same paragraph as the History because I find it similiar. Perhaps not making it sound like a history paper would make it more interesting , but nevertheless , this article potrayed effort in it as it is well written.

Amyaph (talk) 00:53, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Amyaph, Asyfie.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:23, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Buffalo Bill Ranch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.omaha.com/article/20110713/NEWS01/707139886#cody-ranch-plans-august-reopening
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120729131429/http://outdoornebraska.ne.gov/parks/guides/parksearch/showpark.asp?Area_No=38 to http://outdoornebraska.ne.gov/parks/guides/parksearch/showpark.asp?Area_No=38

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:58, 10 November 2016 (UTC)