Talk:Buffy the Vampire Slayer (2002 video game)
Development history
editIt actually went Playstation -> Dreamcast -> PC -> Xbox.
- I found references and updated this. Ace of Sevens 02:43, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Was this game not re-released for the PC? I'm almost convinced that I've seen a PC version of it out there. Research so far has been inconclusive. -- Jayunderscorezero 00:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Buffy (XBox Video Game).jpg
editImage:Buffy (XBox Video Game).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:07, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
I noticed that the Malik link leads to a completely unrelated article that has nothing to do with the character. I was wondering if someone with the slightest knowledge of this TV show/video game (not me) could fix this link. Thanks! Cap'n Tightpants (talk) 19:36, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Story section
editThe entire "Story" section is awful, written like a damn brochure or advertisement. Someone rewrite it and make it encyclopaedic! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.156.136.229 (talk) 19:42, 27 March 2015 (UTC)