 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Cheshire may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Buglawton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717164314/http://clc2.uniservity.com/GroupHomePage.asp?GroupId=255874 to http://clc2.uniservity.com/GroupHomePage.asp?GroupId=255874
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:33, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Merger proposal
editI propose merging the information on Buglawton onto Congleton. I think while there is a lot of information on this article, Buglawton is not really a place of note, as it is a part of Congleton which is a town not a city and thus the information on Buglawton should just be a part of Congleton. Maurice Oly (talk) 00:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose merge: as a former parish it has a distinct existence and merits its own article. PamD 06:37, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Strong oppose per WP:GEOLAND as it was also an urban district as well as a parish, there is no requirement for a place to be a city or town, villages are generally inherently notable. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:45, 18 March 2022 (UTC)