Wikipedia

Talk:Buick Verano

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

}}

File:Buick Excelle GT - China.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  An image used in this article, File:Buick Excelle GT - China.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:38, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Article tone and content

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

The article has a lot conjectural, pro-Verano, pro-Buick, advertising type content that does not meet Wikipedia guidelines:

  • The Verano will be Buick's smallest, most affordable vehicle sold in North America. (unref'd)
  • General Motors predicts that the Verano will attract younger buyers, including many from non-General Motors brands. (unref'd
  • Lyon made the Verano recognizable as a contemporary Buick by employing Buick's key design cues of a waterfall grille, ventiports and taught styling. (Ref'd but not notable, conjectural)
  • Buick considered using a historical Buick vehicle name, but found that Verano was easy to pronounce and fit the vehicle and the Buick brand. Buick believes that Verano has a fresh, trendy, upscale sound and will help support Buick's efforts to attract new, younger customers.(pure hype)
  • Buick hopes to lure buyers away from import brands and cites the Audi A3, Lexus IS250 and Volvo S40 as competitors.(pure pro-Buick hype) 842U (talk) 10:44, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
The article has a lot of fact based, properly sourced information that reflects content published by reliable sources and does a good job of following Wikipedia's guidelines. This article's tone, content and sourcing are fine. A careful look at each of the cited sources (including those in the historical versions) demonstrates that this article consists of properly referenced material from reliable sources in the automotive press. If an editor feels that the article could be better balanced by including contrary viewpoints, that editor needs to find that information in reliable sources and improve the article by adding it. This article, like all others in Wikipedia, should be centered around the events and statements recorded in reliable sources, not 842U's or any other editor's opinions.67.42.92.17 (talk) 04:37, 3 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
On the contrary; the information that's been deleted was largely conjectural and heavily biased toward the subject of the article. Wikipedia guidelines call for a neutral point of view.842U (talk) 09:16, 4 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
You continue to present your point of view as fact, but it is merely your opinion. You have incorrectly stated that certain information is not supported by references, which is contrary to fact. You are censoring information based on opinion, and trying to support your improper position by falsely stating that factual information is not factual. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.37.36.166 (talk) 23:23, 4 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
How odd that editors would join Wikipedia and immediately start in a discussion on this car — and with such a strong point of view, no less. Be sure to avoid 3RR, and please avoid edit warring. If using anonymous logins is a way to edit war, then please reconsider discussing the article further and consider reading wp:BRD. 842U (talk) 11:24, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 17 external links on Buick Verano. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:06, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 17 external links on Buick Verano. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:31, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Buick_Verano&oldid=1200282068"