Talk:Built for the Kill

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

PROBLEMS WITH THIS ARTICLE

edit

This article, in addition to a total lack of citations, reads like a fan's review. It is littered with personal opinion rather than fact. For example:

"Built For The Kill uses a graphical approach to catch the audiences attention, and it works"

"This graphical approach to a nature documentary makes Built for the Kill very interesting to watch"

"Built for the Kill's classic opening..."

"a catchy theme song"


The sentence "it is more fast paced and graphical than the David Attenborough series" appears to be little more than the author attempting to give this series favour over the more famous offerings from David Attenborough and is thus inappropriate; if it is supposed to be highlighting a more than usual pace and graphical quality it should at least say "...than, for example, the David Attenborough series". Even this would be rather vague, as Attenborough has made many series.

The author could improve this article by referring - and adhering - to the WIkipedia advice on writing articles.

Tarquin Q. Zanzibar 22:20, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Built for the Kill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply