Talk:Bumper Stumpers
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Aleding in topic Bumper Stumpers returns to GameTV
This article was nominated for deletion on 29 April 2022. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bumper Stumpers article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bumper Stumpers returns to GameTV
editBut Bumper Stumpers will return to GameTV on Feb 3.
and here's the source:
https://www.igametv.com/shows/1278/
and fail to see how it's unsourced Digifan23 (talk) 17:24, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- This edit is unsourced, and the link in this edit posted February 3 did not originally include scheduling details for February 4. WP:BURDEN of proof is for editors to include sources when adding info. Stop making unsourced edits and they'll stop being reverted for being unsourced. AldezD (talk) 02:51, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- Is it perhaps the nomenclature being used for that reference that is at issue? It appears the edit being made is in document reruns are starting back up and the editor is using an online TV guide as evidence of this fact. While it's debatable if this edit even should be included, can we agree that the reference does support reruns are starting again on certain networks airuditious (talk) 03:08, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- This link is a dynamic target and will change based upon the day it is accessed. It does not meet WP:V. A source that meets guidelines needs to be included with the edit adding information. AldezD (talk) 03:16, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- "Dynamic link" is all that was need to clarify this issue. As such, completely agreed - this does not qualify as a RS. airuditious (talk) 03:17, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- Is it perhaps the nomenclature being used for that reference that is at issue? It appears the edit being made is in document reruns are starting back up and the editor is using an online TV guide as evidence of this fact. While it's debatable if this edit even should be included, can we agree that the reference does support reruns are starting again on certain networks airuditious (talk) 03:08, 4 February 2019 (UTC)