Talk:Bundle branch block
Latest comment: 9 years ago by 5.152.248.5 in topic Review image
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Bundle branch block.
|
Review image
editReview title image File:Bundle_branch_block.svg which appears to be too narrow to meet the criteria for BBB (as mentioned in the article >120ms). In fact, looking at the curvature of the QRS and the fact that a small portion of the biphasic p waves appears to travel backward in time, I suspect that this is not an actual EKG tracing or from obsolete equipment.
http://cdn.lifeinthefastlane.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/RBBB-V12.jpg may represent a better 'rhythm strip' example, though may be subjetct to copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.152.248.5 (talk) 08:44, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Proposed merge
editA merge has been proposed (by another user) between these pages and this page:
Opinions? LT90001 (talk) 02:06, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- Hi and thanks for bringing this up. I had proposed these articles for merger in April so its kind of unfinished business on my part, but there was no consensus as to procedure at that time. The opinions raised then can be found at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine/Archive 34#Bundle branch block. Ochiwar (talk) 08:08, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- Ah, I see. I'm going to detag the pages if there's no objection; I don't think consensus will be built on this one (for the reasons in the archive). LT90001 (talk) 09:01, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- Yes I agree with that view. Ochiwar (talk) 09:07, 29 September 2013 (UTC)