Talk:Bungay

Black Shuck

The article, unfortunately, presents myth as historical fact in relation to the legend of the Black Shuck.

This could be easily be resolved by the judicious use of the words 'legend' and/or 'myth' at appropriate junctures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.12.52.101 (talk) 13:20, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Photo

The photo has no connection with the article. It seems to have been left over from earlier vandalism.--JBellis 07:12, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

Added new photo. Bungay buttercross - most iconic bit of Bungay!Marmaladebadger (talk) 20:14, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

grammar school

Hope someone will add some history of Bungay Grammar School which is now well over 400 years old```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.142.232.9 (talk) 04:59, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 07:09, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

---

Bungay, Suffolk → Bungay — The others are just part matches, check the google search. Crouch, Swale talk to me My contribs 19:33, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

• Support not because the others are partial matches (a reason which has no basis in policy or guidelines), but per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC because the town gets several hundred page views per month, while each of the other articles linked on the dab page get only a fraction of that, therefore the town meets the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC criteria: "much more likely than any other, and more likely than all the others combined – to be the subject being sought when a reader enters that term in the Search box". --Born2cycle (talk) 23:36, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
• Oppose Bungay language is also just Bungay, as is the river and the castle. 65.93.13.216 (talk) 05:46, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
  • No one is denying the existence of other uses. The language article got 12 views total last month, while the river got 327 and the castle got 428. But Bungay, Suffolk got over 1300, clearly meeting WP:PRIMARYTOPIC criteria. --Born2cycle (talk) 07:07, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
• Support per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. – ukexpat (talk) 18:28, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
• Support, others are not directly called this. D. Lion West (talk) 22:11, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Even though I agree with your position (Support), "others are not directly called this" is not a reason that is based on policy or guidelines. What matters in determining primary topic is how likely readers are to enter "this" in the search box when seeking the others. Entering partial titles when searching for articles about the titles is a very common practice, and can make a topic primary for a given homograph even when that homograph is only part of the title of that topic's article. --Born2cycle (talk) 00:43, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
• Support On inspection of the other articles the town appears to be the primary topic. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 09:54, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bungay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110310104611/http://www.bungay-suffolk.co.uk:80/bungay/black-dog-legend.asp to http://www.bungay-suffolk.co.uk/bungay/black-dog-legend.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090901202931/http://www.wrcw.org.uk:80/sports.asp to http://www.wrcw.org.uk/sports.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131105040143/http://www.bungay-suffolk.co.uk/index.asp to http://www.bungay-suffolk.co.uk/index.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:19, 10 November 2016 (UTC)