Talk:Buono!

Take it Easy or COSMIC EYES?

For the next single, it's been shown as Take it Easy as well as Cosmic Eyes, which is it? Was Cosmic Eyes the original title before being changed? 67.249.228.224 (talk) 01:53, 28 June 2009 (UTC)Ulrock7777

Updates?!

A lot has happened with Buono! since 2009. I think someone should keep this updated. Also, Zassou no Uta single and The Best Buono! album don't have links. People might want to take a look at the tracklist for the album. As for Zassou no Uta, the album covers are now out and Wikipedia should give some info on it, like about the Single V and such. Kinda disapointed about the updates on Buono!'s page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.252.167.90 (talk) 01:39, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Interview

Interview (in French)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Buono!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090916072133/http://www.helloproject.com:80/discography/buono/a_002.html to http://www.helloproject.com/discography/buono/a_002.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131101131323/http://www.helloproject.com/discography/buono/a_005.html to http://www.helloproject.com/discography/buono/a_005.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090826140922/http://www.helloproject.com:80/discography/buono/s_003.html to http://www.helloproject.com/discography/buono/s_003.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090406072242/http://www.helloproject.com:80/discography/buono/s_007.html to http://www.helloproject.com/discography/buono/s_007.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090824142521/http://www.helloproject.com:80/discography/buono/s_009.html to http://www.helloproject.com/discography/buono/s_009.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070817122710/http://www.helloproject.com:80/newslist/buono_07210005.html to http://www.helloproject.com/newslist/buono_07210005.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:14, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Buono!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.helloproject.com/discography/buono/a_002.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.helloproject.com/discography/buono/s_003.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.helloproject.com/discography/buono/s_007.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.helloproject.com/discography/buono/s_009.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111011143327/http://gomen-nasai.com/ to http://www.gomen-nasai.com/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.helloproject.com/newslist/buono_07210005.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:42, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Buono!

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Buono!'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "upfrontworksprofile":

• From Mai Hagiwara: "℃-uteメンバープロフィール > 萩原舞" (in Japanese). Up Front Works. Retrieved 2017-06-20.
• From Cha Cha Sing: "cha cha SING" (in Japanese). Up-Front Works. Archived from the original on 2014-04-18. Retrieved 2012-12-08. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
• From Airi Suzuki: "℃-uteメンバープロフィール > 鈴木 愛理" (in Japanese). Up Front Works. Retrieved 2017-06-20.
• From Chisato Okai: "℃-uteメンバープロフィール > 岡井 千聖" (in Japanese). Up Front Works. Retrieved 2018-03-13.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 10:05, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Member colors

The information is reliably sourced now. (It took me a couple of minutes to do it.) --Moscow Connection (talk) 03:35, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Look at the covers of the single "Ren'ai Rider". They have actually worn these colors, they are part of their public image. --Moscow Connection (talk) 03:47, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

I had intended on moving comments from my talk page onto this page for discussion, but if it's not okay with you, then I'm fine with it being removed and apologize if it's not correct conduct. However, what should be reviewed is the relevancy of member colors being included in the article and whether tables should be used. It's very inconsistent across other related idol group/band articles and it seems to be more of something that's important to fans only.

As stated, if you're adamant on including information about colors, put it in prose in the summary. lullabying (talk) 05:30, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

3O Response: A third opinion was requested. Whether to include member colours hinges on whether there are reliable sources attesting those colours. Of course, merely wearing a colour doesn't make it a "member colour". I do not speak the language of the source presented, so if its reliability is in question, I would recommend posting at the reliable sources noticeboard. (Personally I don't think member colours are that important, and if I had written this article, I would probably have omitted them. But I am also ignorant of Japanese music culture, so take my opinion with a grain of salt.)

As for whether the data should be presented in a table, we can take guidance from Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Tables: Often a list is best left as a list. Before reformatting a list into table form, consider whether the information will be more clearly conveyed by virtue of having rows and columns. If so, then a table is probably a good choice. If there is no obvious benefit to having rows and columns, then a table is probably not the best choice. On this basis, given the simplicity of the information to be conveyed, I would lean toward a list or a prose discussion, rather than a table. Thanks, /wiae /tlk 16:35, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your opinion. I have integrated member colors into the article as prose. lullabying (talk) 22:06, 25 September 2018 (UTC)