Talk:Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Article Review

edit

The page for Bureau of Education and Cultural Affairs is clear but too broad. Only providing the history and the programs of the bureau doesn't quite give a clear picture of what the bureau does. Additional information should be added about the organization of the bureau and how there are 7 offices within branch—these can be found on the eca.state.gove website under organizational structure. Also, adding acknowledgements to the Mutual Education and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961 under the history section would enrich the article. Hap22 (talk) 16:44, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:20, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply