Talk:Buridan formula

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's priority scale.

Philosophy: Logic Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

meaning of Barcan's and Buridan's formula.

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This page and the page for Barcan's formula have little content and could probably be merged
All four formulas (Barcan, Buridan, converses) could be described in a neutral manner. This is because a modal operator could have different interpretations. For example, "if there is someone that we know is F, then we know that someone is F". As far as classical quantified modal logic goes, this is also Buridan's formula. The alethic modality interpretation can be discussed separately.

--2607:FEA8:86DC:B0C0:8DC4:5F4C:3654:3D15 (talk) 21:44, 9 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic