This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Capitalize the "D" in Deluxe and put italics around the bracket so it isn't italicized in the infobox.
There's a MOS:SANDWICH issue with the infobox and the Background and recording section currently. While not mandatory for GAs, this could be fixed by sending the picture to the right side.
Is it necessary to bold "Gasoline" in the lead if the song was never released under that title?
Comment: there is a redirect for "Gasoline" that leads here, also this is notable for the lead without adding the full story. --K. Peake07:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
"Jahlil Beats handled the production, while he co-wrote it with the rappers and Alexander Izquierdo" → "Jahlil Beats handled the production, and co-wrote it with the rappers and Alexander Izquierdo"
"It was released in digital download and streaming formats as the second single for the album on" → "It was released for digital download and streaming, as the second single for the album, on"
"In the lyrics of the song, Mill and Big Sean offer encouragement of burning." → "In the lyrics of the song, Mill and Big Sean encourage listeners to burn" maybe?
Billboard is not a part of the Bubbling Under chart's name so it could be removed
Not done the chart is published by Billboard, which can be simplified by mentioning the magazine here.
"On October 10, 2012, an accompanying music video was released, set in a warehouse. It shows Mill and Big Sean accompanied by models, crocodiles, and vehicles, with the cars exploding." → "The music video was released on October 10, 2012, which shows Mill and Big Sean accompanied by models in a warehouse, along with crocodiles, vehicles, and exploding cars."
"Mill contacted Big Sean to work together on "Burn", marking one of the multiple collaborations between Maybach and GOOD rappers." → "Mill contacted Big Sean to work together on "Burn", following several other collaborations between Maybach and GOOD rappers."
"three days before it was included on Mill's ninth mixtape Dreamchasers 2" → "three days before it was released alongside Mill's ninth mixtape Dreamchasers 2" since its inclusion was probably decided upon earlier.
"The song was released to digital download and streaming formats in the US as the second single for the album by Maybach and Warner Bros. on September 11, 2012." → "The song was released for digital download and streaming in the US, as the second single for the album, by Maybach and Warner Bros. on September 11, 2012."
"with general praise for the chemistry of Mill and Big Sean" → "with general praise for Mill and Big Sean's chemistry"
"He said the instrumental's "ferocious energy" is matched by Mill and Big Sean, whose differences make them a powerful duo, with the latter being known for "humor and flash without much muscle" and the former for "grit and aggression" with a lack of wit; he concluded that their styles compliment each other." - This is a long sentence so you could split the parts before and after the semicolon
"that it features the mixtape's best rapping with "Sean's witty rhymes" and concluded of his yacht lyrics: "Anchors aweigh!" - comma after the first quote
Remove Billboard from the Bubbling Under chart here as well.
Partly done it is not at the start, but I wrote published after the chart because this is more detailed than the lead. --K. Peake07:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
"for the week of August 4, 2012" → "for the issue dated August 4, 2012"
Putting this On hold! I'll read through the article again once the comments are addressed but I doubt I will have much to add.--NØ21:14, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Covered everything and read through to be sure; any points of disagreement have been provided with reasoning and thanks for this! --K. Peake07:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.