Talk:Burnaby-class ferry
(Redirected from Talk:Burnaby class ferry)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Hwy43 in topic abbreviation or not
 | The contents of the Burnaby-class ferry page were merged into V-class ferry on 6 December 2024 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Burnaby-class ferry redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Burnaby-class ferry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080513030827/http://www.bcferries.com/about/fleet/profile-queen_of_burnaby.html to http://www.bcferries.com/about/fleet/profile-queen_of_burnaby.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080513032912/http://www.bcferries.com/about/fleet/profile-queen_of_nanaimo.html to http://www.bcferries.com/about/fleet/profile-queen_of_nanaimo.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:28, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
abbreviation or not
edit@Saboteurest: outside lists or tables according to what? Given the limited space in infoboxes, we should be using well-known abbreviations. —Joeyconnick (talk) 03:44, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- User:Alaney2k and I both agree, the full name should be used. Your edit was reverted by both of us. Consensus has been achieved. Saboteurest (talk) 14:57, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- That's pretty much the opposite of how consensus works. a) We weren't having a vote, b) if we were, that's a poll, not consensus, and c) even were a poll the be-all and end-all of how this dispute would be decided (which it wouldn't be), 2 editors with one opinion and another with a differing one is, again, not consensus. Consensus is particularly not a majority in a "vote" among only 3 editors. Now if you want to point me to policies and guidelines which inform your to-my-mind misguided viewpoint that abbreviations are fine in tables and lists but are forbidden in infoboxes, when infoboxes have similar space limitations and could be considered both tables and lists, then that's great... please link away. If not, then obviously this is a case of common sense where, in elements where display space is limited (e.g. an infobox), one would favour official/well-known/common abbreviations. —Joeyconnick (talk) 21:11, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Zzzzzz. Move along please Saboteurest (talk) 00:16, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
- That's pretty much the opposite of how consensus works. a) We weren't having a vote, b) if we were, that's a poll, not consensus, and c) even were a poll the be-all and end-all of how this dispute would be decided (which it wouldn't be), 2 editors with one opinion and another with a differing one is, again, not consensus. Consensus is particularly not a majority in a "vote" among only 3 editors. Now if you want to point me to policies and guidelines which inform your to-my-mind misguided viewpoint that abbreviations are fine in tables and lists but are forbidden in infoboxes, when infoboxes have similar space limitations and could be considered both tables and lists, then that's great... please link away. If not, then obviously this is a case of common sense where, in elements where display space is limited (e.g. an infobox), one would favour official/well-known/common abbreviations. —Joeyconnick (talk) 21:11, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Just a note that Saboteurest has been blocked indefinitely as a sock of the community-banned UrbanNerd. If IPs or newly registered users suddenly appear to make edits to the article or talk page similar to those of Saboteurest, please consider listing the IPs or users at User:UrbanNerd. Hwy43 (talk) 04:49, 13 March 2018 (UTC)