Talk:Burnham, Buckinghamshire
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editEdited the appearance of the word 'town' in this article to village, as technically Burnham is still a village even though it has been engulfed by Slough somewhat.
- Are you able to provide a reference that states one way or the other? Because you can guarantee that in a couple of months time someone else will come along and say "this isn't a village, it's a town, obviously!" -- Roleplayer (talk) 17:29, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- local usage is 'village', and this point is touched on in the introduction. I have a vague recollection (but cannot at this point source) that early references are to Burnham as a town, but with the loss of the market to Maidenhead and rerouting of the Bath Road, the terminology changes to village. Room for someone to do some referencing perhaps? Regardless, remember that there is no legal definition of what is a town / village / hamlet in England. Cities are different... Grblundell (talk) 08:46, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Unsourced statements
editCan anyone source that
- Burnham is a dispersed settlement
- Boveney is back in the civil parish
- Egypt, Buckinghamshire is also in the civil parish
These are in the article and currently unsourced, but don't tie up with my understanding. So I'll remove them unless someone can put me right!
Thanks Grblundell (talk) 17:35, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Burnham, Buckinghamshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10082183&c_id=10001043 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070915034120/http://www.unionsquaremusic.co.uk:80/titlev4.php?ALBUM_ID=85&LABEL_ID=3 to http://www.unionsquaremusic.co.uk/titlev4.php?ALBUM_ID=85&LABEL_ID=3
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:48, 11 November 2016 (UTC)