Talk:Burnham railway station

County?

While the village of Burnham, Buckinghamshire is indeed within Buckinghamshire, the suburb of Slough called Burnham is within the county border of Berkshire. This is clearly visible on the Multimap (see article) within the county border of Berkshire. The railway station is also clearly visible within the county border of Berkshire, i.e. part of the suburb. Does anyone have any contradictory proof? If not, then I intend to change the categorisation to Railway stations of Berkshire. Thanks, Ian Cairns 07:48, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Crossrail icon.png

Image:Crossrail icon.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:01, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Citations

While writing this article I have included original research and I can't quite go about verifying it!

Chelseafan1989 (talk) 21:56, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

you probably should remove the material then - see Wikipedia:No original research for Wikipedia's agreed stance on this. From having done a little bit of copyediting on your most welcome additions, I wonder if you mean the claim that many trading estate workers use the station? This probably is a provable claim - Slough Council, FGW or possibly the rail regulator may well have done surveys of specific destinations. Maybe Slough has evidence showing particularly heavy pedestrian flow along Burnham Lane between station and Trading Estate? This would at least support the point. On the issue of destinations of trains beyond Reading, I queried it because my experience is that trains continue beyond Reading throughout the day rather than just during peak. Maybe a reference to a timetable site would be enough to demonstrate the point one way or another?

keep up the good work! Grblundell (talk) 10:08, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Can't it be re-worded to say that it serves the Trading Estate? I ask as it'd be relevant to the contributions i have planned. What do you say a station is for? As in, if there is ONE station in the whole town, but that station is in a suburb of the town, as opposed to the town centre, say 3 miles north of town centre for example, is it advisable to a)state simply the town name ie Townsville station in Townsville, or say Townsville station in Greensuburb, Townsville. Secondly, if a station is in the middle of nowhere, except for a hotel, or a castle, what could you say? Could you say that Cathays railway station serves the Universities of Cardiff, and University railway station serves the University of Birmingham, or University of Ulster (there are two University stations, west midlands and ireland), if it's not best to say they serve them, what is the appropriate wording? isn't there a railways related question thing on wikipedia, some wiki project where i can ask my questions to? rather than putting it on talk pages?Halowithhorns89 (talk) 17:18, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

if I've understood Chelseafan1989's concern correctly, I'm not sure that this would help. The point that needs to be demonstrated is that Trading Estate workers use Burnham Station. The proximity of the station to the Estate might suggest this - but it is also possible that everyone who works on the Estate drives / walks / cycles / pogosticks their way there. HTH Grblundell (talk) 19:54, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

The recent FGW (December 9th 2007) has ensured that all trains that call at burnham during the day only call at Reading, then the occasional service to Oxford, Banbury, Didcot either at peak periods or late at night and some weekends but even this is rarely set in stone! As for Slough Trading Estate, Burnham railway station more-or-less sits on it so I assume people who live in Central Slough and commute by rail would use this service to get to the Estate (then join the purple bus service to get to the right side of the estate).

Chelseafan1989 (talk) 12:03, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Burnham railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120429040626/http://www.nationalrail.co.uk:80/stations/bnm/localarea.html to http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/stations/bnm/localarea.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:55, 11 November 2016 (UTC)