Talk:Burnout 3: Takedown/GA1
Latest comment: 7 years ago by TheSandDoctor in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: TheSandDoctor (talk · contribs) 03:03, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Currently reviewing --TheSandDoctor (talk) 03:03, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Result: Based on my review of the article, I believe it to be of appropriate quality for Good Article status. The article is well written (criteria #1), verifiable with no original research (criteria #2), broad in coverage (criteria #3), neutral in tone (criteria #4), stable, and is illustrated by images where possible (criteria #5 and #6). The only concern that I do have the the cite kill present within it. With that said, I do not consider that a 'deal breaker' that would block a GA and will look into addressing it myself in a timely manner. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:32, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- I have addressed the citekill issue mentioned before by bundling the citations (WP:CITEBUNDLE). --TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:32, 7 May 2017 (UTC)