Talk:Burns Flat, Oklahoma

median income $1m??? per captia

The median income for a household in the town was $500,000.00, and the median income for a family was $1,000,000.00. Males had a median income of $75.00 versus $900,025.00 for females.

The per capita income for the town was $14,350

something is wrong with those 2 statements.. Needs editing?

median income $1m??? per capita $14,350??

The median income for a household in the town was $500,000.00, and the median income for a family was $1,000,000.00. Males had a median income of $75.00 versus $900,025.00 for females.

The per capita income for the town was $14,350

something is wrong with those 2 statements.. Needs editing?

On the Spaceport that wasn't (or, at least, isn't)

Interesting article here: No spaceships at Oklahoma's spaceport but they are welcome, The Oklahoman, January 17, 2010. Looks like the redevelopment at the old USAF strategic bomber base is on ice. N2e (talk) 02:31, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

More on Rocketplane: "Gone for good."N2e (talk) 02:47, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

People in Florida and Indiana—and other places contemplating spaceports—would do well to learn the lesson of Oklahoma, which a decade ago sought to lure companies to an abandoned air force base in the western part of the state. Rocketplane came to the state to take advantage of tax credits the state offered, and planned to fly from Oklahoma Spaceport, the former Clinton-Sherman Air Force Base in Burns Flat. However, Rocketplane has since run into financial problems, and in an article in Sunday’s The Oklahoman, Bill Khourie, executive director of the Oklahoma Space Industry Development Authority (OSIDA), seemed to suggest they were gone for good. “It’s basically old news,” he said in a video accompanying the article. “Rocketplane’s not around any longer.” — that's from http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/01/17/what-can-florida-indiana-and-others-learn-from-oklahoma/

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Burns Flat, Oklahoma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fprod%2Fwww%2Fdecennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:35, 11 November 2016 (UTC)