 | Buru mountain pigeon has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
 | Buru mountain pigeon is part of the Mountain pigeon series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Buru mountain pigeon/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jens Lallensack (talk · contribs) 20:41, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Reviewing now. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 20:41, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
- link terms: generic and specific name; type locality
- Linked.
- Other common names for the species include Buru mountain-pigeon – I wouldn't call this a distinct common name, it is only a spelling variant that don't warrant mention?
- Removed.
- The Buru mountain pigeon was described as Columba mada – Who moved it when into Gymnophaps?
- Added.
- Gymnophaps – link to genus in main text. I would also include a sentence introducing this genus: Where are the species distributed? Common name seems to be "mountain pigeons"? Such context really helps.
- Added the common name for the genus, but think that distributions would be too in-depth.
- I was thinking about a sentence like "Gymnophaps species are distributed over eastern Indonesia and in the region of Melanesia". I really think it would help with understanding. See also WP:audience for further reasoning. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 16:36, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Added. AryKun (talk) 11:07, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- I was thinking about a sentence like "Gymnophaps species are distributed over eastern Indonesia and in the region of Melanesia". I really think it would help with understanding. See also WP:audience for further reasoning. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 16:36, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Added the common name for the genus, but think that distributions would be too in-depth.
- but was split on the basis of differences in appearance – when was it split, and by whom?
- Added.
- That's it – nice and very solid article! --Jens Lallensack (talk) 21:00, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
- Jens Lallensack, I've addressed all of your concerns. AryKun (talk) 11:49, 2 January 2022 (UTC)