Talk:Bus No. 8 (Bangkok)

Requested move 23 August 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not Moved - No clear consensus to move to requested name or alternatively suggested names. Mike Cline (talk) 11:36, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

---

Bus No. 8 (Bangkok) → Route 8 (Bangkok bus route) – The term "bus number" generally refers to a specific single bus, but this article describes the "route" or "line" as assigned by BMTA/Ministry of Land Transport (which will be renamed to 2-38 per its reform plan). A move to other similar names (that do not mention the "number") instead of this proposed name can be suggested. NotCory (talk) 09:59, 23 August 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 21:30, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

• Use Route 8 (Bangkok) per WP:CONCISE, unless there is some other Route 8 in Bangkok that is not a bus route. Using Route 8 (Bangkok bus route) would just be redundant.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  09:22, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
• Weak oppose. Is the potential confusion actually significant? Most news sources use "No. 8".[1][2][3] I'm not necessarily opposed to adopting a standard scheme that reflects an existing pattern, but one that fits WP:NATURALDIS would be better than parenthetical disambiguation. --Paul_012 (talk) 17:25, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
• Support Route 8 (Bangkok) per User:SMcCandlish. JIP | Talk 00:27, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
• Support move to Route 8 (Bangkok bus route). Route 8 (Bangkok) is ambiguous, and isn't a better title than the one proposed by OP. 162 etc. (talk) 18:46, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
• Relisted due to disagreement on whether to add "bus route" to the qualifier. Is there another public transit Route 8 in Bangkok other than this one? — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 21:31, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
• User:Teampawaris previously renamed the article to Bangkok Bus Line 8, which I reverted because reliable sources overwhelmingly use "Bus No. 8" (also, it shouldn't have been capitalised). I still prefer retaining the current title, but failing that, would prefer similar variants that avoid parenthetical disambiguation over the suggested titles.

To clarify, oppose both Route 8 (Bangkok bus route) and Route 8 (Bangkok). Prefer the following, in decreasing order:

• Retaining the current title (Bus No. 8 (Bangkok)), as the term most commonly used by reliable sources.
• Bangkok bus line 8 or Bangkok bus route 8 (or BMTA line 8 or BMTA route 8 if the name of the system owner is to be preferred). Line appears to be the BMTA's preferred term, though I do think it reads a bit more awkwardly than route.
• Bus route 8 (Bangkok) or Bus line 8 (Bangkok), as "Route 8" alone fails the recognizability criteria.

--Paul_012 (talk) 09:11, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.