Talk:Bush bread

Seed cake?

Is this the same as seed cake?--Shantavira|^{feed me} 11:20, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Merge proposal

The article title Bush bread is a reversal of the article title Seed cake. "Bush bread" has the lead "Bush bread, or seedcakes" and "Seed cake" has the lead "Seed cake or bush bread". As far as I can see the seed cake article needs to be merged into "Bush bread". Otr500 (talk) 14:44, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

I renamed the section title to conform to Wikipedia policy for a "Merge proposal". Otr500 (talk) 23:19, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bush bread. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110314154707/http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/consumerinformation/nuttab2006/onlineversionintroduction/onlineversion.cfm?&action=listFoods&group=Indigenous%20Foods to http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/consumerinformation/nuttab2006/onlineversionintroduction/onlineversion.cfm?&action=listFoods&group=Indigenous%20Foods
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060821223629/http://k6.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/linkages/IntegratedUnits/aboriginal/tech_learn02.html to http://k6.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/linkages/IntegratedUnits/aboriginal/tech_learn02.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:24, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bush bread. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060907220636/http://www.outbushproductions.com/astories.html to http://www.outbushproductions.com/astories.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:58, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Query.

I've worked with many human remains recovered at archeological digs over the years and one thing of note is wear on teeth when eating milled grains. This is notably not evidence in Australian aboriginal remains. Meaning that they either had modern steel milling technology or did not mill grains. I would love to know more about the mortar and pestle depicted and its origins and how they're dating it. If anyone has any information, please post it here. --121.210.33.50 (talk) 16:24, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Came here to ask the same question. I've studied and worked at several hundred archaeological sites across Australia and I've never recovered or seen milling technology - I know oral tradition is accepted as "proof" in this case but there's no evidence for the claim - I was hoping someone had found some actual evidence of these claims because we've been teaching this rote in schools for years even though I've yet to see a single millstone recovered from a dig here. I feel like I am lying to students by telling them all this stuff that there's no evidence for and was kind of hoping for some moral absolution that someone found ... well, anything! So that's two archaeologists with hands on experience who are at a loss, but all these "authors" out there seem adamant, they're usually art graduates though so it leaves me wondering if this is speculative fiction or archaeology they're writing about. 124.190.192.47 (talk) 07:45, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Google Scholar, "Aboriginal Australian grinding stones grain", and the Millstone article has a couple of refs. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:32, 8 September 2022 (UTC)