Talk:Bush regeneration
Latest comment: 15 years ago by 124.185.155.51 in topic [Untitled]
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
[Untitled]
editHi, does anyone know when the idea of assesing a site for wildlife concerns (ie mosaic clearing) first started? I get the feeling it was pretty recent - like mid 1990's. Does anyone know who was instrumental in this? Theorangekombi 05:45, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
This article is myopic and appears biased. It appears to rely on anecdotal evidence with little, or no, content based on fact. Until solid facts can be produced then this page should be considered of dubious value. Should it be deleted until someone can step up and provide clear and defensible text? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.185.155.51 (talk) 04:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)