Talk:Business reference model

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Systems C‑class High‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Enterprise modelling.

Reference Model Example..!?

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I removed the following link

Governments of Canada Strategic Reference Model http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/btep-pto/documents/2004/patterns-patrons/patterns-patrons00-eng.asp or http://www.misa-asim.ca/en/documents/GSRM_Meta-Model.pdf

This seems like a serious and interesting link, but I am not sure this work classifies as a Business reference model.

-- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 19:15, 18 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Double entry:

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The sentence "While many models exist for describing organizations - org charts, location maps, etc. - this model presents the business using a functionally driven approach." is already said in the section before, word by word. > gertraud — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.26.160.181 (talk) 14:58, 24 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Business reference model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080916121546/http://www.doi.gov/ocio/architecture/mbt/step3.htm to http://www.doi.gov/ocio/architecture/mbt/step3.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:00, 11 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic