 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
The linked text of the descision at the bottom seems very abridged and does not contain the phrase res ipsa loquiter? It also does not match the Justicia text found here? (https://law.justia.com/cases/foreign/united-kingdom/159-eng-rep-299-1863.html) Is this an appellate descision? I'm not very familiar with the British system but they both have Pollock as the judge, but I think it's important to have the correct actual text of the case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.84.127.192 (talk) 20:01, 7 December 2023 (UTC)