Talk:Byron-Bethany Irrigation District

Untitled

Peer Review: Whose work are you reviewing?Anna / ARKashuba Link to draft you're reviewing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byron-Bethany_Irrigation_District

Is the content added neutral? Yes. It seems like all of the information is informative data from a neutral standpoint.

Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No

Does the content attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References: It looks like there is a broken link where you had accessed something from the sac state online library, I’m not really sure if there is a way to fix that but if I click it, it just brings me to the Sac State sign in page rather than the article that was used.

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes

Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes, Only an issue with the Sac State login for something that was accessed from the online library source.

Are the sources current? Yes

Check a few links. Do they work? All except for the sac state library.

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, the article is written in a very clear and concise manner.

Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? In the ACWA water leadership award portion I think you had meant to put BBID rather than BBIG.

Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? The content seems to be broken down in a really easy to read manner given that a lot of it has to do with dates and assembly bill 747 which can be difficult to understand if it was all combined. You might want to expand a little on the ACWA water leadership award portion, such as what exactly BBID did to help out during the drought.

Images and Media: Pictures might be a little tough for this topic, but maybe if you were able to find a map that highlights the region that BBID supplies water for could be helpful for the reader.

Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes

How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? Yes

Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary i-foboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Yes

Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Yes

Overall impressions This article seems really well written and very clear and concise so I don’t have many ideas for how to improve. The only thing I think could be improved is a further explanation of what the BBID did to help out during the big drought. Also, the link to the Sac State login under references wouldn’t be accessible to anyone that is not a Sac State student. Great job overall!

Hi Anna, I appreciate your feedback on my draft for this wiki article. Your advice of removing the Crystal Geyser website as a source really helped, I had completely forgot that was one of the things we couldn't use as a source! Also, your formatting feedback was very helpful as I rearranged my article sections and expanded a new section on water chemistry. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rrennecker (talk • contribs) 19:09, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2020 and 22 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ARKashuba. Peer reviewers: Rrennecker.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:07, 18 January 2022 (UTC)