Talk:César Ham
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
editI have heard that he is not dead from non media sources and it is very important that we do not report him as definitely dead. Thanks, SqueakBox talk 18:19, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Totally agree. That would be embarassing for Wikipedia, unfair towards him, and harming his family. Let's stay careful as long as the information is so murky. And as for you criticizing the "wasel word" controversial (actually, I'm surprised that this should fall in this category), I hope it's ok that I use that now, after giving a reference. Gray62 (talk) 19:00, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Some serious issues
editthe poll was binding because zelaya published a decree like four days before june 28 making the poll totally binding and what happened on june 28 was NOT a military coup, i strongly suggest changing "...but never took place because of the military coup on that day." to "...but never took place because of the constitutional crisis that happened that day". Vercetticarl (talk) 01:12, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- 1) Then give us a reliable secondary source making the claim that the poll was binding.
- 2) Typing "NOT" in uppercase won't help convincing anyone that what happen was "not" a coup. A compromise has long been reached on 2009 Honduran constitutional crisis, where the article is titled "crisis", and has a broad scope, while a section of it is titled "coup d'état", and describes specifically the events that happened "that day". Of course, it's the latter that's relevant here, not the former. --LjL (talk) 13:17, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on César Ham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091010202753/http://directoriolegislativo.fdsf.hn/diputado.php?128 to http://directoriolegislativo.fdsf.hn/diputado.php?128
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101024151325/http://www.ticotimes.net/dailyarchive/2009_09/0917091.cfm to http://www.ticotimes.net/dailyarchive/2009_09/0917091.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:24, 16 August 2017 (UTC)