Talk:Boeing C-40 Clipper

Relation to Air force one article

I believe that this article is somewhat related to the Air force one article so i have created a link from there to here and added picture of the nicknamed airforce three C-40B courtesy of USAF (Public domain). -- Jsimeon75 19 Mar 2006

Payload data

The payload data given is for the US Navy's C-40A. The USAF has their C-40B/C configured for VIP transport so there is no cabin cargo capacity, and less passengers are carried. The C-40B/C also has a greater fuel capacity for longer range. The CFM56 engines used have been derated to 24,000 pounds of thrust. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.112.4.233 (talk • contribs) 00:13, December 18, 2006 (UTC)

Yes, that is true. In many articles about aircraft in wikipedia, there may be many variant of that aircraft, all having different specs. In most cases, only one variant has the specs listed. In some cases, this is the most common variant, or perhaps it may be the only variant that has publicly available sources, or it just may be the one that the author picked to include here. I have changed the header to make clear the specs where about the "A" model.

Merger

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No contest. Consensus on Talk:C-40A Clipper was also to merge. - BillCJ (talk) 02:20, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Agree- This is basically a small page split from a bigger page. Kevin Rutherford 01:48, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Concur. I am closing the discussion, and will merge shortly. I don't know how I missed this one, but it shouldn't have been created in the first place. Was done in apparent good faith tho. - BillCJ (talk) 02:20, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Boeing C-40 Clipper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060825213451/http://boeing.com:80/defense-space/military/c40/news/2006/q2/060605a_nr.html to http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/military/c40/news/2006/q2/060605a_nr.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:10, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Checked. (a bit late) Redalert2fan (talk) 19:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Unit listings

wondering why bilcat takes it upon himself to revert properly formatted and referenced unit listings, there is no stated format specifying only squadrons; there are numerous aircraft articles on wiki that include parent units and home bases. Yet another example of how some editors misuse their power.Bob80q (talk) 14:45, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Boeing C-40 Clipper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150218011454/http://www.boeing.com:80/boeing/defense-space/military/c40/index.page to http://www.boeing.com/boeing/defense-space/military/c40/index.page
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160507224503/http://www.scott.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123218288 to http://www.scott.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123218288
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150218011454/http://www.boeing.com:80/boeing/defense-space/military/c40/index.page to http://www.boeing.com/boeing/defense-space/military/c40/index.page
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140223012245/http://www.boeing.com/boeing/defense-space/military/c-40b/index.page to http://www.boeing.com/boeing/defense-space/military/c-40b/index.page
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140330113319/http://www.navair.navy.mil/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.display&key=56247B5B-1D67-4350-8DBE-4E02F17EFA2D to http://www.navair.navy.mil/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.display&key=56247B5B-1D67-4350-8DBE-4E02F17EFA2D
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061207090535/http://history.navy.mil:80/planes/c-40.html to http://www.history.navy.mil/planes/c-40.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:30, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Boeing C-40 Clipper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071023025242/http://boeing.com/news/releases/2006/q2/060605a_nr.html to http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2006/q2/060605a_nr.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boeing.com/boeing/defense-space/military/c40/index.page
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141217141936/http://www.afhra.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=10514 to http://www.afhra.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=10514
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160508000250/http://www.afhra.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=9705 to http://www.afhra.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=9705
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boeing.com/boeing/defense-space/military/c40/index.page
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://history.navy.mil/planes/c-40.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:11, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Boeing C-40 Clipper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160508003639/http://www.afhra.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=12085 to http://www.afhra.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=12085

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Unit Listings

updated the section on "Operators" to include better references and addition of USMC unit but someone continues to revert it. Any explanation?2601:149:8100:B951:9963:681A:552A:73A3 (talk) 02:32, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

User:Bob80q, you aren't allowed to edit Wikipedia, as you've been blocked indefinitely for abusing multiple accounts and IPs, just like you're doing right now. - BilCat (talk) 05:18, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

don't know who that person is, editing and writing without logging in is allowed per wiki rules. Lame excuse for reverting an appropriate edit of course you have a long history of doing so and your reversion of appropriate posts and additions constitutes edit warring.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:149:8100:B951:9963:681A:552A:73A3 (talk) 20:56, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Please Bob, you're not fooling anyone. You edit the same types of articles as you did before you were blocked, with the same styles, among other things. Reverting socks is clearly not vandalism. - BilCat (talk) 21:22, 11 February 2019 (UTC)