Talk:C.D. Saprissa

Bias

"Deportivo Saprissa is one of the most strong squads in UNCAF and CONCACAF region."

Has grammer errors, and also is a little bit biased. "Prolific" is too strong of a word. Use "strong" or "dominant", but prolific is just too subjective.

Image copyright problem with Image:Concacafchampionlogo.jpg

The image Image:Concacafchampionlogo.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

• Image:Costa Rica football association.png

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:08, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Merger proposal

I have proposed that the article, Deportivo Saprissa World Tour 1959 be merged into this article as I do not believe that the article is notable enough to have an article by itself but that the content is notable and valid to be included into this article. Of course if then the article gets too long it would be perfectly possible to create a new article for the clubs history at History of Deportivo Saprissa as for many other football club articles. I would appreciate comments.♦Tangerines♦·Talk 17:52, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Oppose - the main article is already 30KB long and overloaded with tables and lists. there should, however be a sumary paragraph and a {{main}} template linkdramatic (talk) 18:59, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment - I did mention about possibly having a new article, History of Deportive Saprissa as an alternative to merging the two articles which is quite standard on football articles. That would then mean the main article would not be so big, and the content about the tour plus the clubs full history would be in one place. The table situation can be dealt with by changing the format quite easily. Do you think that might be a good idea?♦Tangerines♦·Talk 19:09, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Support - The World Tour article should be merged into a newly created History of Deportivo Saprissa article. Selecciones de la Vida (talk) 22:51, 26 May 2008 (UTC)