Talk:CCH Pounder/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about CCH Pounder. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Nickname
Should this article mention her fan nickname, "Quarter Pounder with CCH?" NEMT 04:11, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Photo
Can anyone suupply a photograph that actually shows what she looks like? I mean, the current photo's very atmospheric and all that, but it could be of anyone. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 16:09, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- In the current photo, whos the guy on the right? --24.21.149.124 (talk) 05:25, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Edit request from Dysantic, 6 April 2010
{{editsemiprotected}} Please revert this article to perhaps the "15:06, 2 April 2010" backup. It has been semi-protected, yet it is still fairly vandalized. A diff between the two will highlight the vandalism.
Thank you. Dysantic (talk) 02:58, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Done thank you for pointing that out. Kindly Calmer Waters 03:36, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Her name
How is she addressed in casual conversation? CCH? Carol? NorthernThunder 04:36, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
She is addressed casually by colleagues as CC, and by Family as carol. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.253.158.20 (talk) 20:46, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
- Has she explained why she styles herself like that ? -- Beardo (talk) 17:09, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Untitled
Mel -- I know using the periods/full stops in her name may be more traditional (and tidier in lists and such), but the actress uses "CCH" without stops as her professional name, as described in the first sentence. I think the article should be moved back, leaving the redirect at "C.C.H." -- what's your opinion? — Catherine\talk 17:13, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
- I would love it if wp would use the proper capitalization, punctuation, etc. (which I will here call 'orthography') in all situations. However, years ago, the result of this discussion was that wp would use a canonical (standard) orthography. This has some advantages (standardization of indexing and searching, ease of use by bots and user macros) and some disadvantages (like this case, where it is just plain wrong). Catherine is obviously correct: the redirection should be interchanged. But in the interests of peace and the success of wp, I would suggest that we leave it the way it is. I'm glad I don't have to vote on this! David Spector (talk) 17:54, 22 July 2011 (UTC)