Pleading for my article about my company

edit

Please view the edited page -- I believe it is a better version and is within Wikipedia's guidelines.

Donny Scott (talk) 00:26, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Notice: This article lacks WP:A to establish WP:CORP

edit
 

In my opinion, this article either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for Organizations and companies, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation.

Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.

Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:Donny Scott (talk · contribs), and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. Happy Editing! — 72.75.78.69 (talk · contribs) 16:39, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

The latest version of the CDS Global page includes information regarding "volume of business" and "market share," with external references. Please examine and provide comment. Thanks to all for your input. Donny Scott (talk) 20:16, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
It looks Much Better now ... time for me to MOVE ON ... Happy Editing! — 72.75.78.69 (talk · contribs) 21:18, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
References have been added to verify the acquisition section, including an article from The New York Times. Donny Scott (talk) 16:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Conflicting company=

edit

There are two high profile software companies called cDs Global. The other cDs Global (www.cdsglobal.com) was the first software firm to develop digital booking systems for model agencies that were (and still are) used by major modeling agencies around the globe over 2 decades ago: elite, ford etc. This system transformed the efficiency of agencies and is deeply integral to the global phenomenon of modeling. Therefore the definition of what CDS Global is ambiguous. Therefore, I propose a disambiguation page to be created or to add the other cDs Global to this entry. Andreabritt (talk) 13:05, 17 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Request for Comment: CDS Global notability

edit

Requesting comment on the notability of CDS Global. The article has been tagged, yet includes updated links to verifiable, third-party references to the company's top ranking as a fulfillment service bureau.

CDS Global RfC – 8.4.08

edit

CDS Global Software company is a conflicting entry for another CDS Global

edit

Just following up on this? There are 2 notable cDs Global companies, leading to a confusion on topic — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andreabritt (talkcontribs) 11:59, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply