Talk:CFM International RISE
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Narutolovehinata5 in topic Did you know nomination
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 09:13, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Article issues; nominator has not edited since March.
( )
- ... that unlike currently used aircraft engines, the in-development CFM International RISE engine would use an open rotor design? Source: CFM Unveils ‘Open Fan’ Demonstrator Plan For Next-Gen Engine, Aviation Week Network.
- ALT1: ... that the in-development CFM International RISE aircraft engine could use hydrogen fuel in addition to sustainable aviation fuel? Source: Boeing Keeps an “Open Mind” on RISE Engine Technology, Airways Magazine.
- Reviewed:
Created by Taavi (talk). Self-nominated at 20:39, 28 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/CFM International RISE; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
New enough and long enough. The user is QPQ-exempt. No textual copyvio issues. Other sources note the unusual nature of the design in the present environment, and both hook facts check out. Looks good to me. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 01:17, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
@Taavi and Sammi Brie: Isn't it a bit WP:TOOSOON to be sending an article about a product under development to the Wikipedia main page? Ultimately the main source cited for this is a company announcement which was republished in Aviation Week, etc. – the type of source that is frowned upon at AfD. There is a lot of promising about a future product that hasn't been evaluated properly by independent secondary sources. Cielquiparle (talk) 16:40, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Upon re-evaluation, the actual content of this article on the main topic (CFM International RISE) is too thin, too promotional, and simply too speculative per WP:CRYSTALBALL. At this time and in its current state, it is not suitable to be featured on the main page. Comments welcome but from me, this is a fail. Cielquiparle (talk) 03:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
