Talk:CFosSpeed
Latest comment: 13 years ago by FleetCommand in topic Citation style template
This article was nominated for deletion on 20 September 2021. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
No third party citations etc.
editArticle could probably do with a bit of sorting out, as it's just an advertisement at the moment. Add citations, which need to be from third parties in order to satisfy [WP:NN] (e.g. reviews of the software on popular download sites), otherwise it might get flagged for deletion. Not a regular Wikipedia contributor, so not sure what else to suggest. Arfed (talk)
- I was trying to give a concise account of what cFosSpeed is doing. I'm sorry for the advertisement-like style, I'm not used to write in Wikipedia. Maybe somebody can improve the style? As to the reviews, I have one here from a well-known German computer magazine (c't), but it's print. I guess, I can just quote from it? Both German and translated to English? Any ideas appreciated. Oliver91978 (talk) 16:10, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Citation style template
edit Resolved
Is the {{Citation style}} template reference now superfluous after I fixed the {{Cleanup-link rot}}? Oliver91978 (talk) 11:19, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
- No, it is not. Article citation style is definitely problematic. Use of {{Cite web}} and such is advised. Fleet Command (talk) 06:47, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
- I think this issue is entirely resolved. :) Fleet Command (talk) 07:07, 18 January 2011 (UTC)