Talk:CLP Regulation

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Occupational Safety and Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemistry Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The lists of hazardous substances in this regulation (1272/2008) located in Annex I and II have been superceded by a new set of lists list located in Council Regulation EC 790/2009 (referenced in #8). This is a very large change and should not be covered by further legislation heading. Is it possible to edit the front matter to identify this? Can you add something like: The lists of hazardous substances found in the CLP regulation have been ammended by EC/790/2009 and new lists are located there." then link to number 8.Pollygirl610 (talk) 18:16, 30 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

I don't like "The" as the first word in the title. I'd prefer "European" or "Globally". What do others think? Biscuittin (talk) 22:41, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Agree. Done. Physchim62 (talk) 13:49, 23 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Council

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

In this article, does "Council" refer to Council of Europe, Council of the European Union or European Council? Biscuittin (talk) 22:45, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

It refers to the Council of the European Union. Physchim62 (talk) 13:49, 23 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Link doesn't work

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The link to ECHA webiste is no longer working, ref. 2 should be http://echa.europa.eu/clp_en.asp

BHumphrys (talk) 13:46, 21 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on CLP Regulation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090309042730/http://echa.europa.eu:80/classification/clp_regulation_en.asp to http://echa.europa.eu/classification/clp_regulation_en.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:04, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic