Talk:CMLL World Tag Team Championship

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:CMLL World Tag Team Championship/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 14:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  14:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   "declaring them the official #1 contender for the champion" - why not write out 'number one' in prose?

   "The championship has been declared vacant" - why the need to link vacant?

   "On one occasion CMLL held up the championship, basically vacating the championship until a rematch" - remove 'basically'

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   No original research found.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

This article is a good example of excellent writing and comprehensiveness. In short, it meets the criteria, so promoted JAGUAR  19:32, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on CMLL World Tag Team Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cmll.com/02_resultados/super_viernes/super_viernes_cmll.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160225094829/http://www.fuegoenelring.com/noticias_detalle.php?articles_id=4186 to http://www.fuegoenelring.com/noticias_detalle.php?articles_id=4186
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://cmll.com/02_resultados/super_viernes/super_viernes_cmll.htm
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6LDla2zy5?url=http%3A%2F%2Fentertainment.howstuffworks.com%2Fpro-wrestling.htm to http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/pro-wrestling.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cmll.com/02_resultados/martes_arena_mex/martes_arenamex.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://cmll.com/noticias.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:34, 12 November 2016 (UTC)