Talk:CNDO/2

" Although CNDO is based on quantum chemistry, it is more specifically one of the first semiempirical methods" The introductory phrase is downright stupid, as it seem to imply that semiempirical methods cannot be based on quantum chemistry. It also is illiterate, as "more specifically" right after "although" shows. Shame on the Wiki-editors community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.72.144.148 (talk) 20:09, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

I do not think it implies that at all. I think the "more specifically" implies that semiempirical methods are a sub-set of quantum chemistry, but it could be better worded. Why did you not suggest a better wording yourself. We are all volunteers. We are not paid to edit wikipedia. --Bduke (Discussion) 22:00, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

"It is noteworthy that CNDO does not involve knowledge about chemical bonds but instead uses knowledge about quantum wavefunctions." How is it noteworthy? All quantum chemistry methods use wavefunctions, and there are hardly any that can be said to "involve knowledge about chemical bonds". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.78.183.142 (talk) 18:40, 27 January 2019 (UTC)