Talk:CSM Reșița
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:Csm resita.gif
edit
Image:Csm resita.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:32, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Csm resita.gif
edit Image:Csm resita.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:59, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Requested move 17 June 2019
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: move (closed by non-admin page mover) DannyS712 (talk) 20:21, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
CSM Școlar Reșița → CSM Reșița – This move is necessary because CSM Școlar Reșița won back the club record, brand (including the old logo) and right to use the old name CSM Reșița (Clubul Sportiv Municipal Reșița) (Sports Club of Municipality Reșița) instead of CSM Școlar Reșița (Scholar Sports Club of the Municipality Reșița). The brand and record were won back from the former president of the club, Robert Benczik, in January, this year, but a change of name can be made only after the end of the season, so, during this summer. The club also started to use the old logo and name on their social media pages. On soccerway the move was still not made, but the page of the club from soccerway is a bit outdated, also the stadium is not correct.
References
- ^ "CSM Resita si-a recuperat palmaresul" [CSM Resita won back its record]. caon.ro. 11 January 2019. Retrieved 17 June 2019.
- ^ "EXCLUSIV / OFICIAL Clubul de tradiție și-a recuperat palmaresul și își schimbă denumirea! » Primele reacții oficiale: "Vă anunțăm cu bucurie că s-a rezolvat"" [EXCLUSIVE / OFFICIAL The club with tradition that has recovered its record and changes its name! »First official reactions:"We are happy to announce that it has been solved"]. Gazeta Sporturilor. 12 January 2019. Retrieved 17 June 2019.
- ^ "CARAȘ-SEVERIN / Clubul din Reșița, la 93 de ani de la înființare" [CARAŞ-SEVERIN / The club from Reșița, 93 years from its foundation]. Romanian Football Federation. 6 March 2019. Retrieved 17 June 2019.
- ^ "Un nou club de tradiţie urcă în Liga 2? Actuala echipă a Reşiţei a preluat palmaresul fostei campioane din Valea Domanului. Ambiţia primarului, condiţiile de Liga 1 şi implicarea lui Chivu" [A new club of tradition goes up in the League 2? The current team of Reșița took over the record of the former champion from the Doman Valley. The ambition of the mayor, the conditions of League 1 and the involvement of Chivu]. ProSport. 18 April 2019. Retrieved 17 June 2019.
- ^ "Reşiţa revine în Liga 2! CSM Şcolar şi-a primit trofeul de campioană a Seriei a 4-a a Ligii 3, iar din vară îşi schimbă denumirea şi devine club de tradiţie. "Am intrat în fotbalul mare"" [Reşiţa return to the second league! CSM Şcolar received the trophy for the champions of the 4th series of the Liga 3, and from summer it will change its name and becomes a club of tradition. ”We entered in the big football”]. ProSport. 20 May 2019. Retrieved 17 June 2019.
Rhinen (talk) 19:11, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 08:35, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support per nom. GiantSnowman 08:36, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support Everything seems to be in order. Soccerway takes a while to update lesser league teames. Katz191 (talk) 09:01, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.