Katz191

Bernardo Tengarrinha

Hello there from Portugal,

i try to explain it politely, why do you revert me without one word? We don't link countries like Portugal (please read this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Linking#What_generally_should_not_be_linked), and when a player plays abroad we write the country where he plays (like in Tengarrinha's case). Why an edit war over this?

Attentively --Quite A Character (talk) 19:12, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

• No problem, and thanks for the quick reply! As far as i can remember, yes, always like that. I tri(ed) to link a country at least one time (otherwise i would not know why would they have an article on a country if we can't link it), but the fact is that i always got reverted. So, i gave up.

Happy editing/weekend --Quite A Character (talk) 19:42, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

• I think the proper move would be to do what you suggest, if club has changed name we insert the current wikilink of the club's name in the players' pages, then add the name at a given time in history. A good example of this could be Nuno Viveiros, which i now adjusted in the infobox.

Hopefully i was of help, regards --Quite A Character (talk) 22:46, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

(Sorry for the delay, only returned now from a short holiday)I see that the page has already been moved by you, and it was a 100% correct action. If there are enough RELIABLE sources supporting an athlete's sporting name, then you can move the page immediately in the "move" field, no other requirements (other than writing a short summary when moving the page, for example "Moving page per WP:COMMONNAME").

Cheers, from Portugal --Quite A Character (talk) 16:54, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

• FINALLY, news have been disclosed to the public (speaking about Tengarrinha)! Inserted ref in article, all the best to the player and cheers to you. --Quite A Character (talk) 16:10, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Full name in intro?

The full name in the intro is not required. Admin User:GiantSnowman confirmed this to me. Stop changing it. BTW, the position doesn't neccesarily need to be after the club.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 21:02, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

• There is NO PROBLEM whatsoever to display the full name of clubs in intro or storyline, don't worry man :) We have more important things to worry here than that. I have been here for 11 years and do that 99,99999999999999% of the time, i have not had any problem ever.

Cheers --Quite A Character (talk) 21:25, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Fernando Varela

Please choose article name carefully before any move, Fernando Varela Ramos is a footballer also. Matthew_hk tc 17:21, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

So, please cleanup you mess on "update" the link of a perfectly disambig title Fernando Lopes dos Santos Varela , to the wrong one Fernando Varela (footballer). Matthew_hk tc 17:28, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

My apologies Matthew, I misunderstood the guidelines for the Moving a page procedure. Thanks for noticing my mistake and for taking the time to correct it (there were a lot of hyperlinks you had to move:). If there is anything else feel free to contact me on my Talk page.

Regards, Katz191 (talk) 12:25, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Platini (Cape Verdean footballer)

Hi there KATZ, how are you?

Let's go bit by bit (and first of all, congratulations on moving the page, it was needed yes sir): 1 - box, no need to write ACADÉMICA DE COIMBRA OK? Only one club in Portugal like that (and possibly in the world), no need for the city; 2 - no need for sub-sub-sections in the club career when content is so little; 3 - quite serious in my opinion, without one word you removed two links that are quite useful for Portuguese/longtime Portugal-based players - as is Platini's case - especially FORADEJOGO which is reliable by WP standards (see here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Platini_(Cape_Verdean_footballer)&diff=794119106&oldid=794115875), please don't do that again; 4 - when a sic template is used, it's to show a word was written poorly in the original article but we copy it in the same way it was written by the journalist/blogger, please do not remove that again, as here (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Platini_(Cape_Verdean_footballer)&diff=next&oldid=794124920; never mind, i have removed said source for reasons i explained in the edit summaries and added a more reliable one); 5 - no numbers needed in honours, especially when it's (1) or (2); 6 - even though NFT.com does not give the player that second goal for Cape Verde, i respected your work and added a source to the international goals chart, that way it won't be removed ;)

Have a nice weekend, cheers --Quite A Character (talk) 21:48, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

• I think i was polite enough to merit a reply, but i could be wrong somehow. I apologize if you felt offended by my comments, not my intention. --Quite A Character (talk) 21:42, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Ah, vacation, cool! I don't pay too much attention to guidelines, and my approach is quite simple and i think adds detail to the information on clubs names: full name in storyline, compression in box. Regarding the doubt on "Académica", i repeat: i think there is only ONE CLUB with that name in the world, so "Académica" is quite enough in box; if a reader still as doubts when consulting the infobox, they can go to the storyline where they will see the full name "Académica de Coimbra" written, and say "Ah, that Académica" :)

Happy rest, regards --Quite A Character (talk) 20:56, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

• Hello there! No congratulations needed, i don't support Sporting or any Portuguese team, i don't like teams with 20/25 foreign players, what's the point on having an academy then? Regarding your question i agree, i would like to have to box compressed to "Inter" always (or "Inter Milan" as you say), but some users (user?) keep(s) reverting it to "Internazionale" so i gave up. There is also a great wiki-controversy from way back in time, when someone moved the page from "F.C. Internazionale Milano" to "Inter Milan", there has NEVER been a consensus here regarding the better way to present the club's name from what i understand.

Cheers --Quite A Character (talk) 21:34, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Cosmin Contra

Good first win for Romania, maybe the good fortunes will continue from now on!

A couple of things i'd like to discuss with you, regarding this article: 1 - display of contents: we either have PLAYING CAREER (divided in club and international, no need for "career" then, it's implied) and MANAGERIAL/COACHING CAREER or CLUB CAREER and INTERNATIONAL CAREER, meaning it's preferrable to have two sub-sections, not three. As Mr. Contra has had a very significant career so far (he has even reached the national team), let's go with PLAYING and COACHING OK?

Regarding the managerial statistics section, it's better to leave that as a section and not a sub one, his coaching stats should be separated from those as a player.

Have a nice weekend, cheers --Quite A Character (talk) 17:31, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks for helping out, man! A shame about Tengarrinha, all that matters now is that he gets his health back, so young... Marques, well, i cannot honestly say he has had any season without injury problems, so that makes sense :( --Quite A Character (talk) 20:41, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

INCREDIBLE (about Tengarrinha)! The Portuguese web mentions nothing on his disease, I suppose if Poli released a video on their YTube account the family and the player had no problem on making disease public. It seems as though, to Portuguese sports writers/sites, if 99,99999999999999999999% of the news don't have anything to do with the God Ronaldo, then they are of no interest. A pity (note, I improved the player's article the best I could, but did not write anything on his current condition because, even though I trust you 100%, this is a serious matter that needs to be sourced as you surely understand; if we add it to the storyline without a source, it would be removed sooner or later)... --Quite A Character (talk) 10:51, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

February 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Laurențiu Buș, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.--Oleola (talk) 14:22, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Adrià Gallego

The article Adrià Gallego has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Player has not played in a fully professional league

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RRD (talk) 06:32, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Adrià Gallego for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adrià Gallego is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrià Gallego until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hhkohh (talk) 19:55, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Loan

Bai Katz, meciurile la echipa a doua nu sunt considerate imprumuturi! Nu mai pune sagetica aia langa cum ai facut la Adam Lang.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 11:13, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Poli Iași

Nu mai schimba peste tot numele in Poli Iași. De exemplu, in perioada in care se numea Studentesc asa trebuie sa apara si pe articole, nu cu numele nou. E ca la FCSB, acum jucatorii pot avea FCSB in infobox, dar pana in 2017 au tot Steaua.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 08:34, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Restored

I saw your request. Hkohh can’t restore it as they were only the nominator and not an administrator. I have restored and userfied it for you so it can be improved and updated before being moved back into article space. It is at User:Katz191/Adrià Gallego. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:55, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Platini - Reply

Hello there, good morning

that mistake happens to the best, no problem :) About the spacings, I do not understand why people do that, but if it's more comfortable for you go ahead.

Happy editing, from Portugal --Quite A Character (talk) 09:10, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Ovidiu Hațegan

I was touched by this situation that happened two days ago, and paid my respects to the man by improving (hopefully!) his article, may his mother rest in peace (Mr. Hategan is younger than me)...

I think i got everything right, with refs from several languages, but i don't know for sure if what i wrote in the PERSONAL LIFE section is totally correct (i took it from his Romanian Football Federation profile). Our wiki-friends :@Rhinen: and :@8Dodo8: can also help out if they want ;)

Searching the net while working on this article, found this disgusting piece of garbage (please see here https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/northern-ireland-stars-wife-launches-13886358), people have no shame, making a war out of a sport and doing it through SOCIAL MEDIA, i hate that with all my power. Anyone still thinks football is a party? Certainly not me, i tell you!

RIP Mrs. Hategan, regards to you three! --Quite A Character (talk) 04:08, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Co-ownership

We list co-ownership as it is a definitive / "outright" deal, or a definitive deal with a "fancy" buyback. Moreover on Gianmarco Zigoni, he did spent half season in Genoa and scored for their Primavera team. Matthew hk (talk) 17:17, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Oh, thanks for the catch. But on a personal note, if he would not have played the half year with Genoa, would it then be ok to not have them in the senior career or do you still have to mention them? Is there a consensus or something? Katz191 (talk) 17:23, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

I don't think interlacing senior and youth career in infobox is a good idea. He made his professional debut with Treviso, and he played 18 games as a regular . Also, many Serie A club set the age limit of their Primavera team at 19 (instead of 20), and then it became an official rule in mid-2010s, it gave me even stronger reason to consider Zigoni's Genoa career is a senior career. Matthew hk (talk) 17:39, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Pagini mutate

Am propus mutarea a doua pagini, daca vrei sa-ti exprimi o opinie, esti binevenit; pag: Talk:CSM Olimpia Satu Mare & Talk:Stadionul Tudor Vladimirescu (2019) Rhinen

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)