Talk:CU-SeeMe

Removed Text

I have removed 2 paragraphs from the article. Normally I don't like to do it but I can't even make out heads or tail out of what is said and there seems to be a couple of issues with it being NPOV. Hopefully the author can come back and try to re-articulate what he was trying to say. To that I kindly offer these suggestions:

1. Wikipedia isn't in the business of determining truth or disseminating opinions. Saying "That is not true" is pushing an opinion, try "...Others believed that this was untrue due to reason #1, #2, #3..." and better yet back it out with footnotes.

2. "Falling like rabbits falling from a hat".... I don't even know where to start with this. I am just baffled as to how someone could have seen that so often as to make it a saying.... whatever it means.

Best of luck --Nicklinn (talk) 00:49, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

I believe White Pine Software acquired distribution rights to CUSeeMe in 1996, not 1998. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.18.170.61 (talk) 06:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Should we make a mention of VChat, the client for OS X that (purportedly) still works with CU-See Me reflectors? The link is at VChat homepage --Connectionfailure 07:47, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

vchat seems gone,the client had a very uncool expiration build in anyway - hamano removed the Pmrf (cuseeme reflector hack works with whitepine password pretection and does ip randomization)

also i put everything i found here http://ipsix.org/source/  --92.228.141.82 (talk) 23:29, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on CU-SeeMe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110818160921/http://ipsix.org/source/dorcey.html to http://ipsix.org/source/dorcey.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110818160849/http://ipsix.org/source/cuseeme_project.html to http://ipsix.org/source/cuseeme_project.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110514142029/http://ipsix.org/source/historyofvideoconferencing.html to http://ipsix.org/source/historyofvideoconferencing.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:48, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Hierarchical Distribution technology

What was the name of the distribution technology which CUSeeMe made use of (it began with M but I'm not referring to MCU)? I remember that CUSeeMe brought two breakthroughs:

1. the use of mosaic updates of the image, leaving unchanged portions of the picture alone and concentrating bandwidth on the portions which needed updating. It even updated those sections with progressively smaller blocks in order to convey as much information as possible, up-rezzing as bandwidth and time allowed.

2. M-something, in which the video stream was sent to a handful of facilities (large universities at the time), who would then send to another 8-10 points, and so on down the hierarchy, so that the source "provider" of the stream didn't have to have a separate connection with every individual viewer. This was used during retransmissions of NASA TV. If it were properly investigated, this might also deserve mention in the article; naturally, my sketchy information is not sufficient. --Redrocketred (talk) 02:30, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

"hardware quality audio and video"

While not directly competing against hardware-assisted video-conferencing companies, it suffered in that the nascent market was expecting hardware quality audio and video when CPUs of that time weren't really ready to support that quality level in software.

What is meant by 'hardware quality audio and video'? Surely, any video and audio are always coming from hardware (camera or capture card, and microphone. 24.51.192.49 (talk) 02:57, 26 April 2023 (UTC)