Talk:CaGrid

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Merge?

edit

Most of the article is about caBIG except for the litany of releases and web sites. These seem outdated anyway: in ten years, how important will a list of releases up to 2009 be? We should examine if these two are independently notable enough to survive deletionists. I would think one integrated article with inline citations would be better than two dated stubs. W Nowicki (talk) 21:09, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on CaGrid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:47, 22 February 2016 (UTC)Reply