Talk:Caiman (genus)
 | A fact from Caiman (genus) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 October 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Inaccurate Information on Caiman size
editThe opening paragraph says that caiman are small, with all species only reaching a couple meters in length. However, the article on the Black Caiman (which this article links to) says that the Black Caiman reaches 5-6 meters. The opening paragraph to this article should be adjusted, because the Black Caiman size figures are correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.198.97.148 (talk) 02:23, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- The Black caiman is not a member of the genus Caiman, but rather has the scientific name Melanosuchus niger. This page is about the genus Caiman. There is a separate page for all caimans. Cougroyalty (talk) 15:48, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Proposed merger
edit"Caiman" should be redirected here instead of the subfamily caimaninae because it's a genus, not a subfamily. And remove the stupid part "(genus)" from this title, and insert an s in the end of caiman, because it's not one and species, its more than one caimanS. And don't merge this article to caimaninae, becauce that subfamily even have the genuses Melanosuchos and Paleosuchus.--Buggwiki (talk) 19:33, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- I think the redirect is treating caiman as a common name for members of the Caimaninae rather than just abusing a generic name. Abyssal (talk) 17:41, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
General information on caimans
editGeneral information pertaining to all caimans really belongs in the "Caiman" article, not this one. There are three living genera of caimans, and this article only covers one of them. WolfmanSF (talk) 21:39, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Caiman (genus). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160308154704/http://www.iucncsg.org/365_docs/attachments/protarea/04_C-c7ff4560.pdf to http://www.iucncsg.org/365_docs/attachments/protarea/04_c-c7ff4560.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:01, 11 December 2017 (UTC)